The IQ chart

The IQ scale chart: seven levels from Extremely Low to Very Superior

The IQ scale is a standard score: mean 100, standard deviation 15.1 The Wechsler tests divide it into seven IQ levels, each with its own score range. Extremely Low is 69 and below, Borderline 70 to 79, Low Average 80 to 89, Average 90 to 109, High Average 110 to 119, Superior 120 to 129 and Very Superior 130 and above. Half of all people score between 90 and 109.

IQ ranges and levels with percentile, share of the population, rarity and meaning
IQ range Level Percentile Share of people How rare What it means
130 and above Very SuperiorWISC-V: Extremely High 98th and above 2.2% About 1 in 44 The usual gifted-programme and Mensa threshold. Rare enough that a clinical report will state a confidence band around it. Read 130
120 to 129 SuperiorWISC-V: Very High 91st to 97th 6.7% About 1 in 11 score 120 or higher Clearly above average. Common among people in demanding academic and technical work, but far more common than the top band. Read 125
110 to 119 High Average 75th to 90th 16.1% About 1 in 4 score 110 or higher Above the middle of the curve without being unusual. One in six people land here. Read 115
90 to 109 Average 25th to 74th 50.0% Half of everyone The broad middle. Half the population scores between 90 and 109, so "average" is a wide street, not a point. Read 100
80 to 89 Low Average 9th to 24th 16.1% About 1 in 6 Below the middle but within the normal range. Typical everyday functioning; abstract, fast-paced tasks may take more effort. Read 85
70 to 79 BorderlineWISC-V: Very Low 2nd to 8th 6.7% About 1 in 15 Well below average. Read with context, and with a clinician if it comes with real-life difficulties. Read 75
69 and below Extremely Low Below the 2nd 2.2% About 1 in 44 A score here is one of two criteria for an intellectual disability diagnosis; the other is difficulty with everyday adaptive skills. Read 70

The IQ ranges are conventions, not cliffs. A 129 and a 131 are the same performance wearing different labels, which is why a clinical report always prints a confidence band around the number.2 The share column comes from the normal curve the scale is built on, so it is symmetrical: 2.2% at each end, 6.7% in each of the next two levels, 16.1% in each of the two beside the middle.

The IQ bell curve, mean 100 and standard deviation 15 A normal curve centred on 100. Half of all scores fall in the shaded 90 to 109 band, 68% between 85 and 115, 95% between 70 and 130, and 2.2% at each tail beyond 130 or below 70. IQ 90 to 109: about half of all scores 95% of people score 70 to 130 68% score 85 to 115 50% score 90 to 109 2.2% score 130 or higher 2.2% score below 70 55 -3 SD 70 -2 SD 85 -1 SD 100 mean 115 +1 SD 130 +2 SD 145 +3 SD IQ score
The IQ bell curve. The shaded core is the Average band, 90 to 109, which holds half the population; the brackets above it mark the 68% and 95% spans that give the scale its shape.

Two thirds of people sit within one step of the centre, 85 to 115. Nineteen in twenty sit within two steps, 70 to 130. Beyond that the curve thins so fast that each further point removes a shrinking slice of the population, which is the single most useful thing to know before reading any high score.

Score by score

IQ percentile chart: every score from 55 to 160

A percentile is the share of the norm group scoring at or below a given score. To get one, subtract 100 from the IQ and divide by 15. That is the z-score, and the area under the normal curve to its left is the percentile.7 The rarity column turns the same figure into a count of people, which is how most of us actually picture it.

IQ score to percentile, rarity and level, 55 to 160 in steps of five
IQPercentileHow rareLevel
55 0.1th 1 in 741 score lower Extremely Low
60 0.4th 1 in 261 score lower Extremely Low
65 1.0th 1 in 102 score lower Extremely Low
70 2nd 1 in 44 score lower Borderline
75 5th 1 in 21 score lower Borderline
80 9th 1 in 11 score lower Low Average
85 16th 1 in 6 score lower Low Average
90 25th 1 in 4 score lower Average
95 37th 1 in 3 score lower Average
100 50th 1 in 2 score higher Average
105 63rd 1 in 3 score higher Average
110 75th 1 in 4 score higher High Average
115 84th 1 in 6 score higher High Average
120 91st 1 in 11 score higher Superior
125 95th 1 in 21 score higher Superior
130 98th 1 in 44 score higher Very Superior
135 99.0th 1 in 102 score higher Very Superior
140 99.6th 1 in 261 score higher Very Superior
145 99.9th 1 in 741 score higher Very Superior
150 99.95th+ 1 in 2,330 score higher Very Superior
155 99.95th+ 1 in 8,137 score higher Very Superior
160 99.95th+ 1 in 31,560 score higher Very Superior

The same fifteen points buy very different rarity depending on where you start. Going from 100 to 115 moves you past a third of the population. Going from 130 to 145 moves you past only 2%, because almost nobody is left out there. Percentiles thin out faster than the eye expects, and a difference of three or four points anywhere on the IQ score range is inside the measurement error of a single sitting.

Reading a level

What counts as a normal, good, high or genius IQ

The words people search for are not the words on the IQ chart, so here is the translation, one IQ level at a time.

A normal IQ

Normal is 90 to 109, the Average level, and it holds half of everyone. Widen it to 85 to 115 and it holds 68%. A report that says 96 or 104 is describing the middle of the population, not a strength or a weakness. Nor is an 88 a verdict: it sits at the 21st percentile, one person in five, and its error band reaches well into Average. The average IQ is 100 by definition on every modern test, because each test is normed to make it so.4

A good IQ

There is no official cutoff for good. Above 110 you have outscored three in four people. Above 120 you have outscored ten in eleven. The more honest question is good for what. The High Average level is common among university graduates and people in knowledge work, but most jobs are done well across a wide stretch of the scale, and conscientiousness, sleep and experience move outcomes at least as much as fifteen points do. Psychologists who give these tests tend to put it more plainly: an average score is a good score, because it is the score that does almost everything most people need to do.

A high IQ

High usually means 120 and above, the Superior level, which is the top 9%. Very Superior begins at 130, the top 2%, and that is the line most gifted programmes and every Mensa chapter use. Mensa accepts 130 on a WAIS or Stanford-Binet 5, 132 on an older SD 16 Stanford-Binet and 148 on the Cattell scale, all of which mark the same 98th percentile.5 Some school districts admit gifted pupils at 125 or the 97th percentile instead.

A genius IQ

No test defines genius. Terman's original 1916 Stanford-Binet table labelled 140 and above "near genius or genius", and the word has stuck to that number ever since.6 On today's scale 140 is the 99.6th percentile, 145 is about 1 in 740, and 160, the ceiling of most tests, is about 1 in 31,000. Above 145 the instruments run out of hard items and norm cases, so the numbers get noisier exactly where the claims get bolder. Charts that stack extra tiers at 140, 160 and 180 with tidy population shares are decorating the tail of a curve no test can measure that finely.

Low scores and intellectual disability

A score of about 70 or below, two standard deviations under the mean, is one of two criteria for intellectual disability. The other is difficulty with everyday adaptive skills such as managing money, communication and self-care, and the DSM-5-TR grades severity by adaptive functioning rather than by the IQ number alone, although the older bands (mild 50 to 69, moderate 35 to 49, severe 20 to 34, profound below 20) still appear in reports.10 About 2.2% of scores fall below 70; not all of the people behind them meet the second criterion.

Other tests, other numbers

Same percentile, different number: how the IQ scale changes by test

Every IQ is 100 + (z × the test's standard deviation). Wechsler tests and the Stanford-Binet 5 use 15.3 Older Stanford-Binet forms used 16, and the Cattell III B used 24. That is why a Mensa letter can say 148 while a Wechsler report for the same person says 130. The percentile is the fact; the number is a dialect.

Three tall measuring rods with differently spaced marks, all crossed by one horizontal line of light at the same height
Three rulers, one height. A score is only meaningful once you know which ruler measured it.
The same z-score and percentile expressed on SD 15, SD 16 and SD 24 scales
Meaningz-scoreWechsler, SB5 (SD 15)Older Stanford-Binet (SD 16)Cattell III B (SD 24)Percentile
Average0.0010010010050th
One SD above1.0011511612484th
High1.3312012113291st
Top 2% (Mensa line)2.0013013214898th
Very rare2.6714014316499.6th
Three SDs above3.0014514817299.87th

Scores of 132, 148, 164 and 172 almost always come from SD 16 or SD 24 scales. On the standard scale they are 130, 130, 140 and 145 respectively. If an old certificate carries one of those numbers, convert it before you compare it with anything on this page.

The oldest scores are a different animal again. Terman's 1916 Stanford-Binet computed a ratio IQ, mental age divided by chronological age times 100, which is where the name and the childhood scores of 180 and 200 come from. Wechsler replaced it in 1939 with the deviation IQ every modern test uses, a position on the normal curve of same-age peers.6 Even on modern tests the number moves with the battery: Alan Kaufman's textbook example is a pupil who scored 125, 110 and 105 on three well-normed tests in the same year.

Labels move too. Publishers describe the same IQ ranges with different words, and the Wechsler family itself switched to value-neutral labels with the WISC-V in 2014 and kept them for the WAIS-5 in 2024: Extremely High, Very High, High Average, Average, Low Average, Very Low, Extremely Low.6 The ranges did not change. Only the adjectives did.

What the major tests call each IQ range
IQ rangeWAIS-IVWISC-V, WAIS-5Stanford-Binet 5Woodcock-JohnsonDAS-II
130 and aboveVery SuperiorExtremely HighGifted (130 to 144); Very gifted (145+)Very Superior (131+)Very High
120 to 129SuperiorVery HighSuperiorSuperior (121 to 130)High
110 to 119High AverageHigh AverageHigh AverageHigh Average (111 to 120)Above Average
90 to 109AverageAverageAverageAverage (90 to 110)Average
80 to 89Low AverageLow AverageLow AverageLow AverageBelow Average
70 to 79BorderlineVery LowBorderline ImpairedLowLow
69 and belowExtremely LowExtremely LowMildly Impaired (55 to 69)Very LowVery Low

Our own data

What 5.3 million test sittings show about reading the scale

Between 23 June and 2 September 2026, 2,622,229 people completed the MyIQTested test 5,344,654 times. That is a large enough sample to see how behaviour moves a score, and three patterns matter for anyone reading their own number. The charts below use the 105,149 sittings from the United States; the same shapes appear in every country we checked.

  • 5,344,654completed sittings
  • 2,622,229people
  • 8.3 minmedian time taken (US)
  • 1 in 3people sat the test again

Rushing costs about thirty points

People who finished in under two minutes averaged 98. People who took five or six minutes averaged 123, and those who took a quarter of an hour or more averaged 130. The rise is steep, steady and identical in every country. Time is not intelligence, and the fastest finishers include people clicking through to see the results page. But if you are taking a test to learn something, the minutes are where the points live.

Mean IQ score by the time taken to finish the test, US sittingsMean score climbs steadily with time taken: 98 for sittings under two minutes, 122 at five to six minutes, 129 at ten to fifteen minutes and 130 at twenty minutes or more. 90 100 110 120 130 under 2: mean 97.9, 6,385 sittings 98 under 22 to 3: mean 114.3, 4,608 sittings 2 to 33 to 4: mean 117.1, 4,492 sittings 3 to 44 to 5: mean 119.8, 5,739 sittings 4 to 55 to 6: mean 122.5, 7,601 sittings 123 5 to 66 to 8: mean 125.4, 17,733 sittings 6 to 88 to 10: mean 127.2, 16,370 sittings 8 to 1010 to 15: mean 128.6, 23,161 sittings 10 to 1515 to 20: mean 129.5, 8,356 sittings 15 to 2020+: mean 130.3, 4,591 sittings 130 20+ minutes taken to finish mean score
Mean score by time taken, 99,036 US sittings. The median sitting took 8.3 minutes; a quarter took under 5.4. Hover a point for its sample size.

A next-day retake lifts about six in ten scores

One person in three came back for a second full sitting. When the second attempt came within the hour it was usually a resubmission and moved little. When it came the next day, 59.5% of people scored higher and the average gain was 4.2 points, close to the quarter of a standard deviation that a meta-analysis of retest studies reports for a second sitting.9 The scale did not change. The person practised. That is one more reason to read a single result as a band.

Change in score on a second sitting, by the gap between sittings, all countries
Gap between sittingsPeopleAverage changeScored higher
Within an hour551,670+2.3 points37.7%
1 to 24 hours199,121+4.2 points59.5%
1 to 7 days96,498+3.6 points58.2%
A week or more47,286+2.3 points54%

Raw reasoning scores peak in the late twenties

Our test scores everyone on the same items with the same key, so the age curve shows raw performance rather than an age-adjusted IQ. US takers aged 25 to 34 averaged 127. Those over 65 averaged 115, and under-13s averaged 118. This is the fluid-reasoning gradient that cognitive ageing research describes, and it is exactly why clinical tests compare you with your own age group.12 A 68-year-old and a 28-year-old with the same raw performance receive different IQs on a WAIS, and the older adult's is higher. See average IQ by age for the age-normed picture.

Mean raw score by age band, US sittingsMean raw score rises from 117 among under-13s to a peak of 127 at 25 to 34, then falls to 123 at 55 to 64 and 115 at 65 and over. 110 115 120 125 130 under 13: mean 117.5, 14,462 sittings 118 under 1313-15: mean 123.1, 21,708 sittings 13-1516-17: mean 124.3, 12,066 sittings 16-1718-24: mean 125.9, 15,472 sittings 18-2425-34: mean 127.0, 10,484 sittings 127 25-3435-44: mean 125.8, 6,579 sittings 35-4445-54: mean 124.9, 4,386 sittings 45-5455-64: mean 122.6, 3,050 sittings 55-6465+: mean 114.7, 3,357 sittings 115 65+ age band, self-reported mean raw score, not age-normed
Mean raw score by self-reported age band, 91,965 US sittings. Hover a point for its sample size.

How to read these numbers

Sittings are self-selected and unsupervised, and the test is a 33-item form built on the public ICAR item bank with a reliability of about .78.11 It reports on the 100 and 15 scale against an online research norm rather than a census-matched sample, so its absolute averages run higher than a clinical test would give the same people. Read the shapes, not the levels. Retake figures use the first two full sittings per visitor; time figures exclude sittings under 30 seconds or over an hour. Method details are on the methodology page.

Precision

What one IQ score can and cannot tell you

Every score on the chart carries error. Full Scale IQ on the WAIS-IV is among the most reliable measures in psychology, with internal consistency between .97 and .98 across all thirteen age groups.13 Even that leaves a standard error of measurement near two and a half points, which puts the 95% confidence interval about five points either side. A 120 is best imagined as 115 to 125. A short online test is wider still, around ten points either side, and online scores, ours included, tend to run higher than a supervised test would give the same person, because the norms are drawn from web samples rather than a census-matched one.

A child standing beside a door frame where the height mark is a soft glowing band rather than a thin line
A score is a band on the door frame, not a pencil line.

Three other things sit outside the number. First, the profile: two people with the same Full Scale IQ can have opposite strengths across verbal, spatial, memory and speed indices, and for most practical questions the profile matters more than the total. Second, time: measured performance has risen about three points a decade across the twentieth century, the Flynn effect, which is why tests are re-normed and why a 1995 score and a 2025 score with the same number rest on different comparison groups.8 Third, the day: sleep, anxiety, illness, a second language and a noisy room all move a sitting by more than the difference between two neighbouring levels.

Use the scale to

  • Place a score against the population and read its percentile honestly.
  • Translate numbers between tests before comparing them.
  • Check whether a difference between two scores is bigger than the error band.
  • Decide whether a formal assessment is worth arranging.

Do not use it to

  • Rank people, including yourself, on worth or potential.
  • Diagnose anything from an online score.
  • Treat 129 and 131 as different kinds of mind.
  • Read creativity, judgement, persistence or kindness, none of which it measures.

Your own score

How to place your own score on the IQ scale

  1. 1

    Check the scale

    Find the test name on the report. Wechsler and Stanford-Binet 5 use SD 15. Cattell and older Stanford-Binet numbers need converting first; the lookup at the top does it.

  2. 2

    Find the IQ level and percentile

    Read the row in the IQ chart. 115 is High Average and the 84th percentile; 130 is the Very Superior line at the 98th.

  3. 3

    Widen it to a band

    Add and subtract five points for a clinical test, ten for an online one. That band is the claim the score can actually support.

  4. 4

    Read what the number means

    The score-by-score guide covers 70 to 150. For the top-2% line, read the Mensa qualifying guide. For a web score, read how online tests compare with supervised ones.

Questions

IQ scale questions people ask

How high does the IQ scale go?

Most modern tests stop reporting at about 160, and many at 150 or 155, because too few people score up there to norm the items. On the standard scale 160 is four standard deviations above the mean, about 1 in 31,000 people. Famous claims of 200 or more come from old ratio formulas or extrapolation, not from a normed test.

What IQ is the 95th, 98th or 99th percentile?

On the SD 15 scale the 95th percentile is an IQ of about 125, the 98th is about 131, and the 99th is about 135. The 90th percentile sits at 119 and the 99.9th at 146. Read the same figure on a SD 16 test and each number shifts up by a point or two above 100.

Is 148 a good IQ?

It depends on the scale it was measured on. On the standard SD 15 scale 148 is above the 99.9th percentile, roughly 1 in 1,000. But 148 is also the exact top-2% cutoff on the Cattell III B scale that Mensa has used, where it equals 130 on a Wechsler test. Scores of 132, 148, 164 and 172 usually come from SD 16 or SD 24 scales, so check the test name before reading the number.

What is a full scale IQ?

Full Scale IQ is the composite score on a Wechsler test, built from ten core subtests that also produce index scores for verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory and processing speed. It is the number the classification table describes. A short online test estimates general ability from fewer items, so it is not a Full Scale IQ in the Wechsler sense.

Is the IQ scale different for adults and children?

The scale is the same, mean 100 and SD 15, but the comparison group is not. Clinical tests compare you with people your own age, so a ten-year-old and a forty-year-old with the same IQ are each average for their age. Raw performance on reasoning items changes with age, which is exactly why the age norms exist.

Is IQ a linear scale?

No. IQ is a rank turned into a number, not a quantity of intelligence. A person with an IQ of 140 is not twice as able as a person with 70, and the fifteen points between 100 and 115 cover a third of the population while the fifteen between 130 and 145 cover about 2%. The scale is linear in standard deviations, not in people.

What does "between the top 6th and 10th percentile" mean on a MyIQTested result?

It means the score is somewhere between the 90th and 94th percentile of the reference group, which on this chart is an IQ of about 119 to 123. The result is stated as a band rather than a point because a short test carries measurement error. Our results page prints the top-percent wording; this chart translates it back into a score.

How is an IQ score calculated from a test?

Your correct answers are scored against a norm group, converted into a z-score, and placed on the 100 and 15 scale with the formula IQ = 100 + 15z. Modern tests weight items by difficulty with item response theory before that step. The percentile then follows from the normal curve, which is why the score and the percentile always travel together.

Or sit another scored test, free and with no signup

Michael Hodge, Founder & Assessment Director. Bachelor of Science (Psychology), University of Wollongong. with the sitting analysis, the percentile chart and the lookup.

Sources (13)
  1. Pearson Assessments. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV)
  2. Pearson. WAIS-IV Technical and Interpretive Manual Update
  3. Riverside / HMH. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition, Assessment Service Bulletin 3
  4. Mensa International. What is IQ?
  5. American Mensa. Qualifying test scores
  6. Wikipedia, checked 2026-09-03. IQ classification (publisher label tables for WAIS-IV, WISC-V, SB5, Woodcock-Johnson, DAS-II)
  7. University at Albany, Department of Psychology. Standard normal distribution table
  8. Pietschnig and Voracek, Perspectives on Psychological Science (2015). One century of global IQ gains: a formal meta-analysis of the Flynn effect
  9. Scharfen, Peters and Holling, Intelligence (2018). Retest effects in cognitive ability tests: a meta-analysis
  10. American Psychiatric Association. Intellectual disability: diagnostic criteria (DSM-5-TR summary)
  11. Condon and Revelle, Intelligence (2014). The International Cognitive Ability Resource: development and initial validation of a public-domain measure
  12. Salthouse, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (2010). Selective review of cognitive aging
  13. Canivez, in The Eighteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook, Buros Institute (2010). Review of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition