The IQ scale sets the average at 100 and counts in steps of 15 points, one standard deviation each. So 85 to 115 holds about two thirds of people, 130 begins the top 2%, and 70 marks the bottom 2%.
The IQ chart
The IQ scale is a standard score: mean 100, standard deviation 15.1 The Wechsler tests divide it into seven IQ levels, each with its own score range. Extremely Low is 69 and below, Borderline 70 to 79, Low Average 80 to 89, Average 90 to 109, High Average 110 to 119, Superior 120 to 129 and Very Superior 130 and above. Half of all people score between 90 and 109.
| IQ range | Level | Percentile | Share of people | How rare | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 130 and above | Very SuperiorWISC-V: Extremely High | 98th and above | 2.2% | About 1 in 44 | The usual gifted-programme and Mensa threshold. Rare enough that a clinical report will state a confidence band around it. Read 130 |
| 120 to 129 | SuperiorWISC-V: Very High | 91st to 97th | 6.7% | About 1 in 11 score 120 or higher | Clearly above average. Common among people in demanding academic and technical work, but far more common than the top band. Read 125 |
| 110 to 119 | High Average | 75th to 90th | 16.1% | About 1 in 4 score 110 or higher | Above the middle of the curve without being unusual. One in six people land here. Read 115 |
| 90 to 109 | Average | 25th to 74th | 50.0% | Half of everyone | The broad middle. Half the population scores between 90 and 109, so "average" is a wide street, not a point. Read 100 |
| 80 to 89 | Low Average | 9th to 24th | 16.1% | About 1 in 6 | Below the middle but within the normal range. Typical everyday functioning; abstract, fast-paced tasks may take more effort. Read 85 |
| 70 to 79 | BorderlineWISC-V: Very Low | 2nd to 8th | 6.7% | About 1 in 15 | Well below average. Read with context, and with a clinician if it comes with real-life difficulties. Read 75 |
| 69 and below | Extremely Low | Below the 2nd | 2.2% | About 1 in 44 | A score here is one of two criteria for an intellectual disability diagnosis; the other is difficulty with everyday adaptive skills. Read 70 |
The IQ ranges are conventions, not cliffs. A 129 and a 131 are the same performance wearing different labels, which is why a clinical report always prints a confidence band around the number.2 The share column comes from the normal curve the scale is built on, so it is symmetrical: 2.2% at each end, 6.7% in each of the next two levels, 16.1% in each of the two beside the middle.
Two thirds of people sit within one step of the centre, 85 to 115. Nineteen in twenty sit within two steps, 70 to 130. Beyond that the curve thins so fast that each further point removes a shrinking slice of the population, which is the single most useful thing to know before reading any high score.
Score by score
A percentile is the share of the norm group scoring at or below a given score. To get one, subtract 100 from the IQ and divide by 15. That is the z-score, and the area under the normal curve to its left is the percentile.7 The rarity column turns the same figure into a count of people, which is how most of us actually picture it.
| IQ | Percentile | How rare | Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| 55 | 0.1th | 1 in 741 score lower | Extremely Low |
| 60 | 0.4th | 1 in 261 score lower | Extremely Low |
| 65 | 1.0th | 1 in 102 score lower | Extremely Low |
| 70 | 2nd | 1 in 44 score lower | Borderline |
| 75 | 5th | 1 in 21 score lower | Borderline |
| 80 | 9th | 1 in 11 score lower | Low Average |
| 85 | 16th | 1 in 6 score lower | Low Average |
| 90 | 25th | 1 in 4 score lower | Average |
| 95 | 37th | 1 in 3 score lower | Average |
| 100 | 50th | 1 in 2 score higher | Average |
| 105 | 63rd | 1 in 3 score higher | Average |
| 110 | 75th | 1 in 4 score higher | High Average |
| 115 | 84th | 1 in 6 score higher | High Average |
| 120 | 91st | 1 in 11 score higher | Superior |
| 125 | 95th | 1 in 21 score higher | Superior |
| 130 | 98th | 1 in 44 score higher | Very Superior |
| 135 | 99.0th | 1 in 102 score higher | Very Superior |
| 140 | 99.6th | 1 in 261 score higher | Very Superior |
| 145 | 99.9th | 1 in 741 score higher | Very Superior |
| 150 | 99.95th+ | 1 in 2,330 score higher | Very Superior |
| 155 | 99.95th+ | 1 in 8,137 score higher | Very Superior |
| 160 | 99.95th+ | 1 in 31,560 score higher | Very Superior |
The same fifteen points buy very different rarity depending on where you start. Going from 100 to 115 moves you past a third of the population. Going from 130 to 145 moves you past only 2%, because almost nobody is left out there. Percentiles thin out faster than the eye expects, and a difference of three or four points anywhere on the IQ score range is inside the measurement error of a single sitting.
Reading a level
The words people search for are not the words on the IQ chart, so here is the translation, one IQ level at a time.
Normal is 90 to 109, the Average level, and it holds half of everyone. Widen it to 85 to 115 and it holds 68%. A report that says 96 or 104 is describing the middle of the population, not a strength or a weakness. Nor is an 88 a verdict: it sits at the 21st percentile, one person in five, and its error band reaches well into Average. The average IQ is 100 by definition on every modern test, because each test is normed to make it so.4
There is no official cutoff for good. Above 110 you have outscored three in four people. Above 120 you have outscored ten in eleven. The more honest question is good for what. The High Average level is common among university graduates and people in knowledge work, but most jobs are done well across a wide stretch of the scale, and conscientiousness, sleep and experience move outcomes at least as much as fifteen points do. Psychologists who give these tests tend to put it more plainly: an average score is a good score, because it is the score that does almost everything most people need to do.
High usually means 120 and above, the Superior level, which is the top 9%. Very Superior begins at 130, the top 2%, and that is the line most gifted programmes and every Mensa chapter use. Mensa accepts 130 on a WAIS or Stanford-Binet 5, 132 on an older SD 16 Stanford-Binet and 148 on the Cattell scale, all of which mark the same 98th percentile.5 Some school districts admit gifted pupils at 125 or the 97th percentile instead.
No test defines genius. Terman's original 1916 Stanford-Binet table labelled 140 and above "near genius or genius", and the word has stuck to that number ever since.6 On today's scale 140 is the 99.6th percentile, 145 is about 1 in 740, and 160, the ceiling of most tests, is about 1 in 31,000. Above 145 the instruments run out of hard items and norm cases, so the numbers get noisier exactly where the claims get bolder. Charts that stack extra tiers at 140, 160 and 180 with tidy population shares are decorating the tail of a curve no test can measure that finely.
A score of about 70 or below, two standard deviations under the mean, is one of two criteria for intellectual disability. The other is difficulty with everyday adaptive skills such as managing money, communication and self-care, and the DSM-5-TR grades severity by adaptive functioning rather than by the IQ number alone, although the older bands (mild 50 to 69, moderate 35 to 49, severe 20 to 34, profound below 20) still appear in reports.10 About 2.2% of scores fall below 70; not all of the people behind them meet the second criterion.
Other tests, other numbers
Every IQ is 100 + (z × the test's standard deviation). Wechsler tests and the Stanford-Binet 5 use 15.3 Older Stanford-Binet forms used 16, and the Cattell III B used 24. That is why a Mensa letter can say 148 while a Wechsler report for the same person says 130. The percentile is the fact; the number is a dialect.
| Meaning | z-score | Wechsler, SB5 (SD 15) | Older Stanford-Binet (SD 16) | Cattell III B (SD 24) | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | 0.00 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 50th |
| One SD above | 1.00 | 115 | 116 | 124 | 84th |
| High | 1.33 | 120 | 121 | 132 | 91st |
| Top 2% (Mensa line) | 2.00 | 130 | 132 | 148 | 98th |
| Very rare | 2.67 | 140 | 143 | 164 | 99.6th |
| Three SDs above | 3.00 | 145 | 148 | 172 | 99.87th |
Scores of 132, 148, 164 and 172 almost always come from SD 16 or SD 24 scales. On the standard scale they are 130, 130, 140 and 145 respectively. If an old certificate carries one of those numbers, convert it before you compare it with anything on this page.
The oldest scores are a different animal again. Terman's 1916 Stanford-Binet computed a ratio IQ, mental age divided by chronological age times 100, which is where the name and the childhood scores of 180 and 200 come from. Wechsler replaced it in 1939 with the deviation IQ every modern test uses, a position on the normal curve of same-age peers.6 Even on modern tests the number moves with the battery: Alan Kaufman's textbook example is a pupil who scored 125, 110 and 105 on three well-normed tests in the same year.
Labels move too. Publishers describe the same IQ ranges with different words, and the Wechsler family itself switched to value-neutral labels with the WISC-V in 2014 and kept them for the WAIS-5 in 2024: Extremely High, Very High, High Average, Average, Low Average, Very Low, Extremely Low.6 The ranges did not change. Only the adjectives did.
| IQ range | WAIS-IV | WISC-V, WAIS-5 | Stanford-Binet 5 | Woodcock-Johnson | DAS-II |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 130 and above | Very Superior | Extremely High | Gifted (130 to 144); Very gifted (145+) | Very Superior (131+) | Very High |
| 120 to 129 | Superior | Very High | Superior | Superior (121 to 130) | High |
| 110 to 119 | High Average | High Average | High Average | High Average (111 to 120) | Above Average |
| 90 to 109 | Average | Average | Average | Average (90 to 110) | Average |
| 80 to 89 | Low Average | Low Average | Low Average | Low Average | Below Average |
| 70 to 79 | Borderline | Very Low | Borderline Impaired | Low | Low |
| 69 and below | Extremely Low | Extremely Low | Mildly Impaired (55 to 69) | Very Low | Very Low |
Our own data
Between 23 June and 2 September 2026, 2,622,229 people completed the MyIQTested test 5,344,654 times. That is a large enough sample to see how behaviour moves a score, and three patterns matter for anyone reading their own number. The charts below use the 105,149 sittings from the United States; the same shapes appear in every country we checked.
People who finished in under two minutes averaged 98. People who took five or six minutes averaged 123, and those who took a quarter of an hour or more averaged 130. The rise is steep, steady and identical in every country. Time is not intelligence, and the fastest finishers include people clicking through to see the results page. But if you are taking a test to learn something, the minutes are where the points live.
One person in three came back for a second full sitting. When the second attempt came within the hour it was usually a resubmission and moved little. When it came the next day, 59.5% of people scored higher and the average gain was 4.2 points, close to the quarter of a standard deviation that a meta-analysis of retest studies reports for a second sitting.9 The scale did not change. The person practised. That is one more reason to read a single result as a band.
| Gap between sittings | People | Average change | Scored higher |
|---|---|---|---|
| Within an hour | 551,670 | +2.3 points | 37.7% |
| 1 to 24 hours | 199,121 | +4.2 points | 59.5% |
| 1 to 7 days | 96,498 | +3.6 points | 58.2% |
| A week or more | 47,286 | +2.3 points | 54% |
Our test scores everyone on the same items with the same key, so the age curve shows raw performance rather than an age-adjusted IQ. US takers aged 25 to 34 averaged 127. Those over 65 averaged 115, and under-13s averaged 118. This is the fluid-reasoning gradient that cognitive ageing research describes, and it is exactly why clinical tests compare you with your own age group.12 A 68-year-old and a 28-year-old with the same raw performance receive different IQs on a WAIS, and the older adult's is higher. See average IQ by age for the age-normed picture.
How to read these numbers
Sittings are self-selected and unsupervised, and the test is a 33-item form built on the public ICAR item bank with a reliability of about .78.11 It reports on the 100 and 15 scale against an online research norm rather than a census-matched sample, so its absolute averages run higher than a clinical test would give the same people. Read the shapes, not the levels. Retake figures use the first two full sittings per visitor; time figures exclude sittings under 30 seconds or over an hour. Method details are on the methodology page.
Precision
Every score on the chart carries error. Full Scale IQ on the WAIS-IV is among the most reliable measures in psychology, with internal consistency between .97 and .98 across all thirteen age groups.13 Even that leaves a standard error of measurement near two and a half points, which puts the 95% confidence interval about five points either side. A 120 is best imagined as 115 to 125. A short online test is wider still, around ten points either side, and online scores, ours included, tend to run higher than a supervised test would give the same person, because the norms are drawn from web samples rather than a census-matched one.
Three other things sit outside the number. First, the profile: two people with the same Full Scale IQ can have opposite strengths across verbal, spatial, memory and speed indices, and for most practical questions the profile matters more than the total. Second, time: measured performance has risen about three points a decade across the twentieth century, the Flynn effect, which is why tests are re-normed and why a 1995 score and a 2025 score with the same number rest on different comparison groups.8 Third, the day: sleep, anxiety, illness, a second language and a noisy room all move a sitting by more than the difference between two neighbouring levels.
Your own score
Find the test name on the report. Wechsler and Stanford-Binet 5 use SD 15. Cattell and older Stanford-Binet numbers need converting first; the lookup at the top does it.
Read the row in the IQ chart. 115 is High Average and the 84th percentile; 130 is the Very Superior line at the 98th.
Add and subtract five points for a clinical test, ten for an online one. That band is the claim the score can actually support.
The score-by-score guide covers 70 to 150. For the top-2% line, read the Mensa qualifying guide. For a web score, read how online tests compare with supervised ones.
Questions
Most modern tests stop reporting at about 160, and many at 150 or 155, because too few people score up there to norm the items. On the standard scale 160 is four standard deviations above the mean, about 1 in 31,000 people. Famous claims of 200 or more come from old ratio formulas or extrapolation, not from a normed test.
On the SD 15 scale the 95th percentile is an IQ of about 125, the 98th is about 131, and the 99th is about 135. The 90th percentile sits at 119 and the 99.9th at 146. Read the same figure on a SD 16 test and each number shifts up by a point or two above 100.
It depends on the scale it was measured on. On the standard SD 15 scale 148 is above the 99.9th percentile, roughly 1 in 1,000. But 148 is also the exact top-2% cutoff on the Cattell III B scale that Mensa has used, where it equals 130 on a Wechsler test. Scores of 132, 148, 164 and 172 usually come from SD 16 or SD 24 scales, so check the test name before reading the number.
Full Scale IQ is the composite score on a Wechsler test, built from ten core subtests that also produce index scores for verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory and processing speed. It is the number the classification table describes. A short online test estimates general ability from fewer items, so it is not a Full Scale IQ in the Wechsler sense.
The scale is the same, mean 100 and SD 15, but the comparison group is not. Clinical tests compare you with people your own age, so a ten-year-old and a forty-year-old with the same IQ are each average for their age. Raw performance on reasoning items changes with age, which is exactly why the age norms exist.
No. IQ is a rank turned into a number, not a quantity of intelligence. A person with an IQ of 140 is not twice as able as a person with 70, and the fifteen points between 100 and 115 cover a third of the population while the fifteen between 130 and 145 cover about 2%. The scale is linear in standard deviations, not in people.
It means the score is somewhere between the 90th and 94th percentile of the reference group, which on this chart is an IQ of about 119 to 123. The result is stated as a band rather than a point because a short test carries measurement error. Our results page prints the top-percent wording; this chart translates it back into a score.
Your correct answers are scored against a norm group, converted into a z-score, and placed on the 100 and 15 scale with the formula IQ = 100 + 15z. Modern tests weight items by difficulty with item response theory before that step. The percentile then follows from the normal curve, which is why the score and the percentile always travel together.
Or sit another scored test, free and with no signup
See where your own score lands on this scale
Thirty-three questions, about eight minutes, scored on the same 100 and 15 scale as the chart above.
Take the free IQ test